IGNOU MMPC-001 Block-1 Unit-2 Management and Its Evolution Self Assessment Question Answer Notes | EDU-Favor

Here is IGNOU Latest self assessment Question Answer PDF IGNOU MMPC-001 Block-1 Unit-2 Management and Its Evolution | Management Functions And Organisational Processes MMPC 001 (Block 1 Introduction to Management Unit 2 Management and Its Evolution)  | Also Download MMPC-001 Solved self assessment question paper PDF in English |  IGNOU Management Functions And Organisational Processes MMPC-001 Block-1 Unit-1 Study Material Notes PDF and MMPC 001 Block-1 Unit-2 Terms End Examination based self assessment question paper with answers |  EDU-Favor

Table of Contents (toc)

IGNOU MMPC-001 Block-1 Unit-2 Self Assessment Question Answer Notes |

MPC-001 Block-1 Unit-2 SELF-ASSESSMENT OUESTIONS:

1. What is the contribution of Scientific management to the management thought?
2. What are the experiments conducted by F. W. Taylor? What is your learning from them?
3. Discuss the principles as enunciated by Elton Mayo?
4. Do you think the principles proposed by Henry Fayol apply to all organizations irrespective of size?
5. What is the contribution of Elton Mayo to the Behavioral Movement?
6. Compare and contrast the Theory-X and Theory-Y with examples?

Write short notes on:

• a. Systems Theory
• b. Contingency Theory
• c. Hawthorne experiments
• d. Elements of scientific management.

What is the contribution of Scientific management to the management thought?

Scientific Management, often called Taylorism after its founder Frederick Winslow Taylor, represents the first systematic attempt to apply the logic of science to the problems of management. Before Taylor, management was largely based on "rule of thumb" (intuition and traditional habits); he transformed it into a discipline based on objective data and measurement.

The contributions of Scientific Management to modern thought can be broken down into five key pillars:

​1. The "One Best Way" (Standardization)

​Taylor’s most famous contribution was the idea that every task can be broken down into its smallest components and analyzed to find the most efficient method.

• Time and Motion Studies: By using stopwatches and observing physical movements, managers could eliminate wasted motion and set "standard times" for tasks.
• Standardization: This led to the creation of uniform tools, equipment, and working conditions, ensuring that results were predictable regardless of who performed the task.

​2. Scientific Selection and Training

​Before this theory, workers often chose their own jobs and trained themselves as best they could. Taylor argued that:

• ​Management must scientifically select workers based on their physical and mental capabilities for a specific role.
• Training should not be left to chance; management has a duty to provide systematic, rigorous training in the "one best way" to ensure maximum efficiency.

​3. Separation of Planning from Execution

Scientific management fundamentally changed the hierarchy of work:

• ​Managers Plan: They focus on the science of work, designing the tasks, and scheduling.
• Workers Execute: They focus on performing the tasks according to the precise instructions provided.
• Functional Foremanship: Taylor proposed having multiple specialized supervisors (e.g., speed boss, repair boss, inspector) instead of one general foreman, paving the way for modern specialized management roles.

​4. Financial Incentives (The Piece-Rate System)

​Taylor believed that workers were primarily motivated by economic gain (the concept of the "Economic Man").

• ​He introduced the Differential Piece-Rate System, where workers were paid more if they exceeded the standard output.
• This linked individual performance directly to pay, a precursor to modern performance-based bonuses and KPIs.

​5. The "Mental Revolution"

​Perhaps the most significant theoretical contribution was the idea that management and labor are not natural enemies.

• ​Taylor argued for a "mental revolution" where both sides stop fighting over how to divide the "surplus" (profit) and instead work together to increase the surplus through higher productivity.
• This shifted management's role from "policing" to "cooperating" with workers.

While Scientific Management has been criticized for being too "mechanistic" and ignoring the psychological needs of workers, its legacy is undeniable. It laid the foundation for industrial engineering and the massive productivity gains of the 20th century.

What are the experiments conducted by F. W. Taylor? What is your learning from them?

Frederick Winslow Taylor conducted several experiments to prove that management could be a science rather than just a "rule of thumb." His most famous studies, conducted largely at companies like Bethlehem Steel, focused on the micro-analysis of work.

​1. The Shovel Experiment

​Taylor observed that workers used the same shovel for every material, whether it was heavy iron ore or light rice coal.

• ​The Experiment: He experimented with different shovel sizes and shapes, tracking how much weight a worker moved per day. He systematically reduced the weight of the load on the shovel each day by trimming the shovel or changing its size.
• The Finding: He discovered the "ideal" weight for maximum daily productivity was 21.5 pounds per shovel load. By providing workers with the correct shovel for the specific material, he was able to reduce the workforce from 600 to 140 men while actually increasing total output.

​2. The Pig Iron Experiment

​Taylor studied workers loading "pigs" (92-lb blocks) of iron onto rail cars.

• ​The Experiment: He applied "Time and Motion" studies to break down the movement into parts: picking up the iron, walking on a level surface, walking up a gangplank, and dropping the iron. He also introduced mandatory rest periods.
• The Finding: By selecting the right physical "type" of worker (whom he called "first-class men") and giving them precise instructions on when to work and when to rest, he increased daily loading from 12.5 tons to 47.5 tons per man.

​3. Time and Motion Studies

​Using a stopwatch, Taylor analyzed every single movement a worker made to identify and eliminate "wasted" or inefficient motions. This led to the creation of the "One Best Way" to perform any task.

​Key Learnings from Taylor's Experiments

• ​Efficiency is a Science: Management shouldn't rely on "gut feelings." Every task can be measured, optimized, and standardized to achieve massive gains in productivity (often 200% to 400%) [09:00].
• Standardization of Tools: The "Shovel Experiment" taught us that tools must be matched to the task. This is why modern hardware stores have dozens of specialized shovel types today.
• The "Economic Man" Concept: Taylor learned that high productivity is sustainable only if workers are paid more. He advocated for higher wages (the piece-rate system) to keep "first-class" employees motivated.
• Separation of Brain and Brawn: A major learning was that workers are often too busy doing the work to design the best way to do it. Therefore, managers should be "thinkers" (planners) and workers should be "doers" (executors).
• The Dehumanization Risk: While these experiments made factories incredibly profitable, the learning for modern managers is that treating people like "machines" can lead to burnout, dehumanization, and a loss of connection to the final product.

Discuss the principles as enunciated by Elton Mayo?

Elton Mayo, known as the Father of Human Relations, fundamentally shifted management thought away from the "mechanical" view of Frederick Taylor and toward a "human-centric" view. Based on his famous Hawthorne Experiments (1924–1932), he proposed that workers are not just cogs in a machine but social beings with emotional needs.

Here are the core principles as enunciated by Elton Mayo:

​1. The Social System Principle

​Mayo argued that a business organization is more than just a techno-economic unit; it is a social system.

• Productivity is not just a result of physical conditions (like lighting or temperature) but of the social climate and interpersonal relationships within the workplace.
• The Learning: Management must understand the social structure of the office to improve efficiency.

​2. The Power of Informal Groups

​While Taylor focused on the formal hierarchy, Mayo discovered that informal groups (cliques or work-buddy systems) have a massive influence on behavior.

• Workers often follow "group norms" rather than management's rules. For example, a group might collectively decide to limit output to prevent management from raising the "standard" (a phenomenon called "soldiering").
• ​The Learning: Managers should work with informal leaders rather than fighting them.

​3. The "Social Man" vs. the "Economic Man"

​Mayo challenged the idea that money is the only motivator. He proposed that workers are motivated by social and psychological needs, such as:

• Recognition: Being noticed and appreciated by supervisors.
• Belonging: Feeling part of a cohesive team.
• Attention: The "Hawthorne Effect" showed that workers' productivity increased simply because they felt management was paying special attention to them.

​4. Non-Directive Supervision

​Mayo found that the style of leadership mattered more than the strictness of it. 

• Productivity improved when supervisors were supportive, listened to worker grievances, and treated employees with respect rather than just giving orders.
• ​The Learning: A "participative" leadership style—where workers are consulted before changes are made—leads to higher job satisfaction and lower turnover.

​5. Effective Two-Way Communication

​Mayo emphasized that communication shouldn't just flow downward (orders).

• ​It must flow upward (feedback and grievances) and horizontally (between peers).
• This allows management to understand the "sentiments" of the workers, preventing the buildup of hidden frustrations that lead to strikes or slowdowns.

Summary of Mayo’s Learning

​Mayo’s experiments proved that "a happy worker is a productive worker." He taught us that technical skill is not enough for a manager; one must also possess social skills to manage the "sentiments" and emotions of the workforce.

Do you think the principles proposed by Henry Fayol apply to all organizations irrespective of size?

Yes, the 14 principles of management proposed by Henri Fayol are widely considered universally applicable. Fayol himself emphasized that these principles are flexible and can be adapted to any organization, whether it is a massive multinational corporation, a small family business, or even a non-profit or government agency.

However, the degree and manner of their application change significantly based on the size and context of the organization.

​1. Applicability in Large Organizations

​In large firms, Fayol’s principles act as the "skeleton" of the organization.

• ​Division of Work: Critical in large firms to ensure specialization. You have dedicated departments for HR, Finance, and Marketing.
• Scalar Chain: Essential for maintaining a clear hierarchy and reporting lines across thousands of employees.
• Centralization: Large firms often struggle with this; they must decide how much power to keep at the head office versus regional branches.

​2. Applicability in Small Organizations/Startups

​In small organizations, the principles still exist but are applied more informally.

• ​Unity of Command: Even in a three-person startup, a worker shouldn't receive conflicting orders from two different founders. If they do, productivity drops—proving Fayol’s point.
• Equity & Remuneration: Small businesses rely heavily on employee loyalty. Treating staff with "kindness and justice" (Equity) and providing fair pay is often what keeps a small team together.
• Initiative: In a small team, the principle of Initiative is actually more important than in a large one, as every employee needs to be proactive for the business to survive.

The Verdict: Universal but Flexible

​Fayol explicitly stated that management is not an "exact science." The learning here is that while the logic of the principles applies to everyone, the method of execution must be tailored.

• ​A small shop doesn't need a complex "Scalar Chain," but it still needs to know who is in charge (Authority).
• A startup might ignore "Stability of Tenure" during a pivot, but it will eventually need it to retain talent as it grows.

​The Principles of Management are like a toolbox: a large construction site uses every tool every day, while a DIY home project might only need a few, but the tools themselves are still valid for the job.

What is the contribution of Elton Mayo to the Behavioral Movement?

Elton Mayo is widely regarded as the Father of the Human Relations Movement, a subset of the Behavioral Management School. His contribution was revolutionary because it shifted the focus of management from "How to do the work" (Scientific Management) to "How to manage the person doing the work."

​

His work through the Hawthorne Studies (1924-1932) provided the empirical evidence that destroyed the "machine model" of the worker.

​1. Discovery of the "Social Man"

​Before Mayo, the prevailing view was the "Economic Man"—the idea that people work only for money. Mayo's experiments proved that workers are social beings.

• Learning: Workers have psychological needs for belonging and recognition that are often more important than their physical environment or paychecks.
• ​The "Hawthorne Effect": He discovered that productivity increased simply because workers felt management was paying special attention to them.

​2. Recognition of the "Informal Organization"

​Mayo was the first to formalize the concept of the informal group. He observed that within every formal factory hierarchy, there is a shadow structure of friendships and cliques.

• These groups set their own norms for how much work should be done. 
• ​A worker who produced too much (a "rate-buster") or too little (a "chiseler") would be pressured by the group to conform, regardless of management's incentive pay.

​3. Transition to Supportive Supervision

​Mayo’s research showed that the style of supervision had a direct impact on output.

• ​He advocated for "Participative Management," where supervisors act as facilitators who listen to workers' concerns rather than just "bosses" who give orders.
• ​This led to the introduction of counseling and interviewing programs in factories to allow workers to "vent" their frustrations, which Mayo found actually boosted their productivity.

​4. Holistic View of the Workplace

​Mayo contributed the idea that an organization is a social system. He argued that industrial efficiency is not just a technical problem of engineering, but a social problem of human collaboration.

• ​He emphasized two-way communication, ensuring that information flows from the bottom up (worker feedback) as well as the top down (management orders).

Summary of Impact

​Mayo’s contribution to the Behavioral Movement was the foundation for modern Human Resource Management (HRM) and Organizational Behavior (OB). Without his work, we would likely still be viewing employees as mere extensions of the machines they operate.

Compare and contrast the Theory-X and Theory-Y with examples?

Douglas McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y (1960) represent two diametrically opposed sets of assumptions that managers hold about human nature. These assumptions create a self-fulfilling prophecy: how a manager thinks their team behaves often dictates how the team actually performs.

Comparison Table: Theory X vs. Theory Y

Theory X (The "Authoritarian" View):

• Assumptions: People are inherently lazy and avoid work.
• Responsibility: Employees shirk responsibility and prefer to be led.
• Motivation: Primarily driven by money and fear of punishment.
• Creativity: Most people lack creativity and ambition.
• Leadership: Style Autocratic: Command and control.
• Supervision: Close, frequent micromanagement.

Theory Y (The "Participative" View):

• Assumptions: Work is as natural as play or rest.
• Responsibility: Employees seek and accept responsibility.
• Motivation: Driven by self-actualization and job satisfaction.
• Creativity: Creativity is widely distributed in the population.
• Leadership: Democratic: Participative and empowering.
• Supervision: Loose, trusting, and goal-oriented.

Theory X in Practice: The "Command and Control" Example

​The Scenario: A high-volume call center or a traditional manufacturing assembly line.

• The Manager's Behavior: The manager uses electronic monitoring to track every second of "away" time. They set rigid quotas and use "write-ups" or pay cuts as the primary tool for correcting performance.
• ​The Outcome: Employees do exactly what is required to avoid punishment but rarely offer ideas for improvement. Turnover is high because workers feel like "numbers" rather than people.
• ​Real-World Application: This style is often found in emergency services (police/military) or safety-critical industries (nuclear power plants) where strict adherence to protocol is a matter of life and death.

Theory Y in Practice: The "Empowerment" Example

​The Scenario: A software development team or a creative marketing agency.

• ​The Manager's Behavior: The manager sets the high-level objective (e.g., "Build a faster checkout process") but allows the team to decide how to achieve it. They encourage flexible hours and provide resources for professional development.
• ​The Outcome: Employees take "ownership" of the project. They work late not because they are told to, but because they are excited by the challenge. Innovation thrives because the team feels safe to experiment.
• Real-World Application: Companies like Google, Apple, and Netflix are famous for Theory Y environments where autonomy and intrinsic motivation are the primary drivers of success.

​My Learning: Which is Better?

​It is a common mistake to think Theory Y is "good" and Theory X is "bad." In reality:

• ​Maturity Matters: A new, inexperienced hire may actually prefer Theory X (clear direction and structure) until they gain confidence.  
• ​Context Matters: In a crisis (like a fire in a building), you need a Theory X leader to give immediate, non-negotiable orders. In a brainstorming session, you need Theory Y.
• ​The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: If you treat people like they are untrustworthy (Theory X), they will eventually stop trying to be trustworthy.

Write short notes on: 

a. Systems Theory

b. Contingency Theory

c. Hawthorne experiments

d. Elements of scientific management.

​A. Systems Theory

​Systems Theory treats an organization as a unified, purposeful entity made up of interrelated and interdependent parts (subsystems). Instead of looking at departments like Finance or Marketing in isolation, it examines how they interact to achieve a common goal.

Open vs. Closed Systems: Modern organizations are "Open Systems" because they constantly interact with their external environment (customers, suppliers, government).  

​Key Components: * Input: Raw materials, human labor, and capital.

• Transformation: The internal processes that convert inputs into products/services.  
• ​Output: The final product or service delivered to the market.
• ​Feedback: Information from the environment that helps the system adjust.

Synergy: The idea that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts (1+1=3).

B. Contingency Theory

​Contingency Theory (also called the Situational Approach) argues that there is "no one best way" to manage an organization. The most effective management style depends (is "contingent") on the specific circumstances or situation.

• Key Idea: What works for a tech startup in a fast-paced environment will not work for a traditional government department.
• ​Contingency Variables: These include the size of the organization, the technology used, the complexity of the task, and the stability of the external environment.  
• ​"If-Then" Relationship: If the environment is stable, then a rigid hierarchy works. If the environment is volatile, then a flexible, decentralized structure is better.

​C. Hawthorne Experiments

​Conducted by Elton Mayo at Western Electric’s Hawthorne Plant (1924–1932), these experiments shifted management focus from "engineering" to "human relations."

• ​The Illumination Study: Researchers found that productivity increased when lighting was improved—and when it was worsened.  
• ​The Discovery (The Hawthorne Effect): Productivity increased because workers felt special and "noticed" by the researchers, not because of the physical changes.
• ​Key Findings: Workers are social beings motivated by more than just money (e.g., belonging, recognition).  
• ​Informal groups within the workplace have a huge influence on individual productivity.  
• ​Social and psychological factors are more important than physical working conditions.

D. Elements of Scientific Management

​Developed by F.W. Taylor, Scientific Management aims to maximize industrial efficiency through the application of scientific methods to work.

• Work Study: Breaking down tasks into small movements to eliminate waste (Time, Motion, and Fatigue studies).  
• ​Standardization: Using uniform tools, equipment, and methods for every task to ensure consistency.  
• ​Scientific Selection & Training: Choosing the right person for the right job and training them in the "one best way."
• ​Functional Foremanship: Splitting supervision into eight specialized roles (e.g., Gang Boss, Speed Boss, Repair Boss) to ensure expert guidance.
• ​Differential Piece-Rate System: Paying workers higher wages if they exceed a scientifically set standard of output.  
• ​Mental Revolution: A shift in attitude where both management and workers stop fighting over profits and focus on increasing productivity together.